One for all and all for one - 2

No, guys, I understand that the table is a bit unconventional, but how can you not figure it out when everything has already been explained?

Dimast, let me explain using your example. Let's say you're playing against Slaizer. For you, this is the second cell, and for Slaizer, it's the fifth. Both cells are red. This means that in the first game, Slaizer chooses 3 templates (because he's higher in the table by sequential number), and you choose 1 template from these 3 and a color, and in the second game, it's the other way around.

Honestly, when I read posts from people who can't understand the principles of the chess tables, I was simply shocked.






I changed the tables because some people asked about it, including in private messages, but my mind simply can't adapt to encountering such straightforward reading of the table!!!

Finally, I can't help but explain the reading again:

In addition to everything mentioned above, in each cell, the owner of the color is the one in whose row the cell is located. Take any cell, look at the color - you see in whose row it is located, which means that color belongs to them. It's incredibly complicated and unclear.

Furthermore, in these tables, the results are calculated from the perspective of the one in whose row the cell is located. For example, Player 1 vs Player 2 - 1st game, the color owner is Player 1.
Player 2 vs Player 1 - the color owner is Player 2. That's it.

Well, okay, I've been convinced for the past 2 years that some people look at the tables in such a primitive way that it's almost impossible for them to understand the universally accepted way of reading chess tables. Damn, this is used in all sports in the world, all betting companies in the world are full of such tables, and who knows where else you can see them.

Specifically to those who asked:

So, is it clearer now?