Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

We still need to establish clear definitions: when will a Tournaments be considered a ranked one? The proposed figures of 2-4 people (depending on the version) are clearly too small. For example: I organize a Tournaments. I don't inform anyone about it. I quickly prepare a starting save, even intentionally with flaws. Obviously, no one wants to play in such a Tournaments. But! I invite two or three friends, we play through this Tournaments together, and there you have it, a free ranking. This is not right. Therefore, I propose the following figures:
Heroes 1 - 5 people.
Heroes 2 - 7 people.
Heroes 3 - 10 people.
Heroes 4 - 5 people.
Heroes 5 - 10 people.
For the third game, the limit can be raised even higher, as it is the most popular part. These Tournaments can already be considered ranked, and the representation will be quite sufficient.

I would like to note that a Centralized system for organizing Tournaments is currently being considered.

First of all, it is necessary to make a clear distinction between OFFICIAL TOURNAMENTS – with prizes, rankings, and rules – and UNOFFICIAL, fan Tournaments without taking all of this into account.
This needs to be done in order to increase not only the status of www.heroesworld.ru as a serious gaming resource for the Heroes series on the World Wide Web, but also to encourage users to
participate in Tournaments of DIFFERENT levels.
Fan Tournaments are designed both for training new players and novice organizers, and they can also have a positive impact on various kinds of experiments.

Also, it is necessary to combine ALL SECTIONS ON TOURNAMENTS into one section to reduce confusion among users. And in this section, TOURNAMENTS, create subsections: Tournaments for Heroes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

And, of course, do not forget about a topic in which absolutely all Tournaments held on www.heroesworld.ru would be displayed, regardless of the Tournaments status.

Sincerely, VDV_forever