One for all and all for one - 2

Auto-translated

JustObserver

You can play a huge number of games, have a lot of experience, but have a lower score than a newbie who just joined the portal, which is what this rating shows. Apparently, Sticky (460), Romario (563), and Hermit (588) would also be in the third tier.

Of course, they would be in the third tier; the rules state that the rating decides. It's even good that stronger players (in a subjective view) end up in a lower tier because this allows the captains who choose last to compensate for their inherently worse position in the first round. Also, if you look at the voting, it's easy to imagine a very fun scenario. If there were more votes like those of Calababa, Dirty, and some others, then completely unknown players could become captains, but as they say, we get what we vote for.

Dima Surmay

And if a captain cannot be present during the selection, then we need to think about that. Maybe they should pre-rank all the players according to their priority, and then the host chooses the highest priority player from their list for them. Also, captains should be determined more than 24 hours before the other players are assigned, so they have time to adjust or create a priority list.

I agree; we'll see what we can do about this next year.

МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...

Reading content in

Interface language

One for all and all for one - 2