Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Nothing like that. I believe your claims are completely unfounded, and I also strongly disagree with the idea that color is the deciding factor. Therefore, I didn't change anything and have no intention of doing so.
You can believe whatever you want (because I can also believe that the organizer deliberately arranged four games in a row with blue as the color, especially since there could have been an in-person meeting). Especially without any arguments. It is especially important to consider that if the organizer is also participating in the tournament, they cannot objectively perceive the situation and should definitely listen to outside opinions. It's a case of "I do what I want." In this case, the human factor was revealed, namely laziness and unwillingness to finalize the draw (in the previous tournament, the colors were somehow arranged appropriately). The organizer's position is especially unclear, given the statistics from the previous tournament, where red is the dominant color among the winners. And simply ignoring (or not understanding?) the fact that in an L-shaped map without a dungeon, color is the most important factor (at least he could have looked at the red rush strategy, which is a very relevant parallel).