Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
And finally, the last thing I need to write about is the "New Players" vs. "Legends and Myths" team sub-tournament.
A total of 21 games were played: - 12 on the 2sm4d(3) map, - 5 on Jebus, - 3 on 8mm6a, - 1 on Panic.
The score is 20-1 in favor of LM. The following players brought points to the LM team: twaryna - 6 wins, =Stinger= - 4 wins, numOne - 3 wins, Gomunguls and Pit for LM - 2 wins each, Maretti and LeBron - 1 win each, Javdet and GoD - 1 draw each.
Grizvald and u2noob brought half a point to the NP team.
Interestingly, both draws occurred on the 8mm6a map, and one of them was on full WT. St_Klaus
Dear map creators! Something needs to be done about the CM map. Especially if tournaments are held on it. In terms of imbalance, it can only be compared to Jebus, and even then, not really.
This statement contradicts the experimental data. In the NP vs. LM tournament on CM and Jebus, 12 + 5 = 17 games were played. The "daddy" team showed a 100% result.
I hope that playing and communicating with the Legends was useful for the New Players. And the score in this tournament is completely irrelevant.
Holding such a tournament was an experiment. Therefore, I would like to hear the opinions of the participants. Does it make sense to make such sub-tournaments within the Newcomer tournament a tradition? Maybe there are some interesting ideas and suggestions regarding the format?