Skip to content

The Hunger Games

User Avatar
#23
Auto-translated
Gomunguls
1. That's what makes it interesting – it's unpredictable! It will probably just be a chaotic free-for-all where you have to eliminate everyone else and be the last one standing. Or maybe there will be some strategic plans or alliances. :)
Here, everything is clear about alliances and so on, but the game ends when only two players remain. Do these two share the 1st and 2nd places and both receive rewards? Or do they play until only one remains? This is, of course, about the finale.
Gomunguls
2. The finale will be played in this way. I wrote that there will be a bonus for the winners from the very beginning. The two winners will share 1st and 2nd place in the draw and choose the best colors and castles... and the losers will get what's left.
That's clear. Again, for example, 2 winners (player 1 and player 2) and two losers (player 3 and player 4) are playing. Player 2 and player 3 win. What happens next?
Gomunguls
3. Well, in a 4-player game, I think you should negotiate just like in a 2v2. The main thing is the desire to play, and there seems to be enough time – about 2 weeks.
In 2v2, there is a mandatory time for the game if the players cannot agree on a time themselves. Practice shows that it is very difficult to get four people together at the same time.