Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
1. That's what makes it interesting – it's unpredictable! It will probably just be a chaotic free-for-all where you have to eliminate everyone else and be the last one standing. Or maybe there will be some strategic plans or alliances. :)
Here, everything is clear about alliances and so on, but the game ends when only two players remain. Do these two share the 1st and 2nd places and both receive rewards? Or do they play until only one remains? This is, of course, about the finale. Gomunguls
2. The finale will be played in this way. I wrote that there will be a bonus for the winners from the very beginning. The two winners will share 1st and 2nd place in the draw and choose the best colors and castles... and the losers will get what's left.
That's clear. Again, for example, 2 winners (player 1 and player 2) and two losers (player 3 and player 4) are playing. Player 2 and player 3 win. What happens next? Gomunguls
3. Well, in a 4-player game, I think you should negotiate just like in a 2v2. The main thing is the desire to play, and there seems to be enough time – about 2 weeks.
In 2v2, there is a mandatory time for the game if the players cannot agree on a time themselves. Practice shows that it is very difficult to get four people together at the same time.