R55Max
Auto-translated
There is no explanation there as to why there would be fewer games if my proposal is included in the rules.
There are a lot of arguments, but it's unclear what specifically follows from them.
Come on. Where did you read about such a restriction? Can you quote it?
Message from Oldboy:
If there is an unfinished game (games), before starting a new one, the player must offer his partner in the unfinished game (all partners in all unfinished games) to finish it. Offer it in a messenger for quick exchange of messages (ICQ/Skype/MSN). And only in case of refusal (or no response within 10 minutes) should he start a new game.
Don't you see the proposed restriction? If someone wants to play not with the person with whom the save is, then the game is prohibited. And if he offered to play the save, the opponent agreed, but he is waiting for the person he wanted to play with. And ideally, 2 players (who want to play with each other) would have played a long time ago, and then that save could be finished.
There is no explanation there as to why there would be fewer games if my proposal is included in the rules.
There are a lot of arguments, but it's unclear what specifically follows from them.
That's finally a good one.
I understand that it sounds like a small child in a store starts screaming - "Mom, buy me a car." And when she buys it, he starts screaming "buy me a helicopter," and he doesn't care that there is no more money. But I can't formulate it in a serious way yet.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...