I'm telling you for the hundredth time: you can't limit yourself to games!
Apaches, huh? Why can't you? You've only voiced one argument so far – that there will be fewer games. But you haven't explained how you came to that conclusion.
You just stated it and that's it. How will there be fewer games?
How did you calculate that – write it down.
I don't know why you didn't like their statements, but it looks like childish play. Oh, they didn't say it right, I'm offended.
You're wrong. I didn't ignore them because of this topic. All three have been ignored for a long time after reading their posts in completely different topics, in which I didn't even actively participate. So as not to waste time reading the nonsense from professional trolls.
I wouldn't have even noticed Chingiz's post if Wicc hadn't replied.
--------------
Well, we've found at least one major ideological disagreement.
I believe that starting a new season when there's already one in progress and the opponent is ready to play right now is disrespectful to the opponent.
You don't think so.
For me, this is a revelation.
Well, not exactly a revelation that there are players who can act like this, but a revelation that you're even trying to come up with arguments that it's okay, buddy, we'll finish it later, you can also start a new one with someone else right now :)
But I can't wrap my head around it. First, this approach will create a situation with a bunch of unfinished games, and then we'll heroically finish them within a set maximum time, relying on a written procedure for step-by-step coordination of dates (or, by the way, just abandon them altogether, that is, play fewer games).
Why can't we just avoid this nonsense from the start?