DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”

Oldboy, why are you reading posts so selectively? Skip the described situations about finishing the game and find statements that don't relate to this.

R55Max Regarding the example you provided... You are again (like Lider) giving an example where players had some kind of discussion or acquaintance before the game. A newcomer asks his father to play with him... And I continue to insist that if there were any additional discussions before the game, then there will be few idiots who, in such a situation, will use their right to write a report about technical issues. And those who do exist – it's good that there will be a chance for them to stand out.

Do you want to describe all sorts of situations that are possible for people? Where is the criterion for idiocy?

Reread the top part of my post.

I'm saying -
offer to finish the game, or agree that the opponent also has the right to ignore you if you ignore him.

That's how it should be; if someone starts playing with another, you can also play with another; this is not even up for discussion. The point is that a player, when intentionally running away, should not be able to do so. But limiting him with games is wrong; it should be limited by time! I'm telling you for the 100th time: you can't limit it by games! The point is that if at least one of the players wants the game to end and insists on it, the game should be finished! Running away should be limited by the time allotted for finishing the game, and nothing else! Forbidding playing is stupid! If this is normal for you, then we are simply on different sides, and it is pointless to discuss anything else between us; only a vote will decide!

You can not involve the arbitration committee in the rules, but in any case, it will still work in case of a dispute, considering the dispute. This is inevitable.

Consider the situation as a whole: game, finishing the game, dispute resolution.

dom2, Chingis, and rimpel2 are on my ignore list. I will only find out that one of them wrote something useful if someone else reacts positively. Iamsamstan made a couple of requests to be added to the ignore list, but didn't write anything substantial. Did I forget anyone?

I don't know what you didn't like about their statements, but it looks like a childish game. Oh, they didn't say it right, I'm offended.