Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
conducted an experiment: castle without a fort, garrison - weekly growth without improvements a hero with the same composition attacks
quick battle the results are different each time - from victory to defeat! sometimes crushing, sometimes barely
why is there so much randomness? the conditions don't change
Although in the vast majority of similar tests, the result of the battle will be almost identical - even if you pit legion against legion, the outcome will be the same, with an accuracy of one unit, so there is no scattering here. It has long been noticed that the arrangement of troops is the most significant factor that changes the outcome of the battle. Change the positions of the units before the battle, and the result will be completely different. Regarding morale, it is not a fact that morale works in auto-battle. Auto-battle is a very tricky thing; sometimes it wins battles that are impossible to repeat manually...
AmberSoler
