Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I can definitely keep track of the clan rating using my own system. And I can do it for both systems. Let everyone calculate it their own way, and then we'll simply put the results up for a general vote. The winning rating will become the main one, and the rest will be alternative (we'll have several rating federations, just like in chess). Otherwise, while we don't have enough initial data, we can argue endlessly and get nowhere. As I already mentioned, my rating calculation system, as the respected Iron Axe correctly pointed out, should prioritize placement rather than the result, because the clan rating is not individual; teamwork, team spirit, and other factors are more important here. That's why the linear component in my version partially absorbs the non-linear one.