numOne
Auto-translated
I voted for the idea that the OFB system should constantly change because it really shakes up the tournament, but Dirty still overdid it. Or, if you knew that your imagination would run wild, you could have warned everyone in advance – outlined in general terms what might happen, such as 8mm6a according to anarchy rules and Spider at 200% – that would have reduced the number of participants and the number of disputes.
But overall, the tournament didn't cause me any negative emotions personally, as I played for fun. If I had been competing for a place in the OFB, there would have been reasons for disappointment (as with many here).
Regarding the strict deadlines – that's a huge plus! This is exactly how it should always be done. It's unpleasant, but what can you do?
And the Swiss system – it's a matter of taste; I personally am not a fan of this system, but it is quite suitable for the OFB, where you need to select 5-10 people.
Next time, I would also like to see a few surprises, but without going too far. ;)
But overall, the tournament didn't cause me any negative emotions personally, as I played for fun. If I had been competing for a place in the OFB, there would have been reasons for disappointment (as with many here).
Regarding the strict deadlines – that's a huge plus! This is exactly how it should always be done. It's unpleasant, but what can you do?
And the Swiss system – it's a matter of taste; I personally am not a fan of this system, but it is quite suitable for the OFB, where you need to select 5-10 people.
Next time, I would also like to see a few surprises, but without going too far. ;)
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.