Jebus Cross - 3

Diabler (red, Rampart, Xyron, Pikudram, Kyrre) lose Oldboy (blue, Fortress, Tazar) JC 212
Watched the stream. Thanks for the game.

Details were requested. I'll share a bit. Diabler missed a window closer to the end of the game and sent me a series of messages in ICQ, from which I understood that he was either listening to what I was saying on the stream, or discussing it with someone who was listening and spoiling.
During the game, right after the incident, he agreed that this was indeed the case — his friend, and he named the nickname, in this case spoiled info from my stream. Moreover, I immediately analyzed everything and concluded that Diabler derived absolutely no in-game benefit from this particular spoiler. For some reason, Diabler immediately offered to give him a technical loss (!). I insisted that if this was a one-time spoiler, there was no reason for a tech loss; let's keep playing. We'll talk after the game.
The situation became more complicated after the game, because instead of dotting the i's, Diabler went offline for 3 days in the middle of our conversation. After he went offline, I decided to write to the Tournament Committee.
Later, as a result of a conversation with the Tournament Committee, I made a "confession," stating that I played from 121 surrounded by spoilers; one could say I watched the stream.
Whether he actually gained any in-game benefit from it, I don't know.

The Tournament Committee has not yet announced the final decision; R55Max recorded it as a loss for Diabler. Although in reality it wasn't Diabler who lost the game, but me. So this is not an ordinary loss at all, but a disqualification of the opponent from the tournament for violating the rules of fair play. I am still not sure about the optimality of the decision, but this is not uncertainty about the logic, simply because I still do not have all the source information that I can trust 100%, and probably never will. The Tournament Committee will decide the rest.