The first stage of the tournament "named after Van Kanigem"

Honestly? I can check... Although, it's possible that in the first part, it's all random, and this applies there as well.

It might be the case in the second and third games. In the first ones, the random spawning of monsters is achieved through a simple load or save/load. Accordingly, the computer's behavior is also unclear. That's why there's confusion with the turn transition. It might attack, or it might not. And I don't dispute that you can verify the battle based on the description and screenshots, but that's not what I was asking about. But VDV says that the computer's behavior didn't change after he achieved that situation. But he only tried three times. You need to try much more to be sure of anything, I mean in the first Heroes game.
Once again. Let's say I send you a save file where the computer doesn't want to attack me during the turn transition, and I know that. And I tell you that on my computer, the computer attacks me during the turn transition, but very, very rarely - once a day - if I load the save file for 24 hours. Will you really run this save file for 24 hours straight? Or how else will you check? And I can draw you screenshots of the battle.

Another question for VDV regarding the hero analysis :)
----------------------------------------------
6. The submitted save file should only contain one hero-conqueror, who performs the last action (the others should simply be dismissed).
----------------------------------------------
If the player finishes the game not with the main hero, but with an auxiliary one, is he obliged to analyze the main hero? Or can he indicate in the accompanying note which hero to finish the game with and which to count for experience? In general, it would have been better to write that the final save file should contain NO MORE than two heroes. Please clarify this again