Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I completely agree with the last message.
Okay. And, strangely enough, now it's time for me to provide a practical argument instead of disappearing. Regarding the Diamond tournament.
How would the game statistics change if the rule prohibiting red rushes in this tournament were in effect?
We are comparing two scenarios - with the rule and without it, right? Then, instead of criticizing one of the scenarios, we should compare the two.
How would the game results change if the rule prohibiting red rushes in this tournament were in effect?
Would it be the same, but in one specific game, red wouldn't have red-rushed blue with an overpowered strategy against which nothing could be done?
Then, what's the point of playing without the rule prohibiting red rushes?
If the presence of the ban has as little impact on most games as its absence, except for individual overpowered situations where blue is simply doomed?