Let's talk about our Red Rush strategy...

I'm listening carefully to your reasoning.

I asked a question a little above – is it true that I've managed to provide justification for Diamond so far?

I outlined the general logic in my previous posts; it's universal for all templates.

For Diamond, I simply confirmed my thoughts with statistics from a specific tournament.

If you want to seriously argue, you'll have to add more depth to your own posts. Because in questions that don't allow for strict proof (and the question of balance certainly is one of them), the principle of "more right than" applies. That is, the point of view with deeper and more well-developed arguments is considered more correct. The point of view itself may still be incorrect, but no one will ever know.

If you believe that the arguments presented by you or Dima Surmay are more in-depth than mine, then further discussion doesn't make much sense.