Skip to content
User Avatar
#1465
Auto-translated
I'm tired of making quotes, so I'll just write it like this))))

1) Yes, on the forum. I didn't write it correctly. I apologize.
2) Okay, that would indeed be more logical.
3) I made a mistake, I didn't have time to finish, and it turned out that "most" = "half + 1," although that's not the case. I wrote it wrong again, I'll fix it. I completely forgot about the No Night Vote in case of a lack of votes. Thank you.
4) Well, yeah, it's fun.
5) Well, there are just a lot of clues pointing to different Neutral roles. Corruption, and all that. And as for ordinary murders, I tried to follow the standard.

The only difference is that it will be closer to reality if, after executing a player, the town doesn't learn their role. This is more logical and makes the game more difficult. Then there won't be a situation where you can more or less determine the list of participants, from which several mafia members drowned the town. Since almost everyone has newspaper Neutral roles, it won't be that difficult to figure out who died. Although, of course, it will be much more difficult.

Thanks again, I'll start editing the post now.

Added 7 minutes later
I've made the corrections in the post. Now, the serial killer leaves a clue on the killed player only with a 50% probability. Also, I fixed the mistake with executing a player. The first-night immunity now protects even against an evil serial killer.

Whatever

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: wayal