I'm disappointed by the approach of both the accusing and defending sides to the investigation (although there doesn't seem to be much enthusiasm for providing an explanation). I would like the person being accused to be informed of the suspicions against them in a private message, without jokes or hints, in a dry and strict manner, with a request to describe their actions as thoroughly as possible, also in a dry and strict manner. Refusal = ban, and this correspondence should only be made public in the event of a guilty verdict.
I completely agree; they've thrown a bucket of mud at the person and still expect them to remain calm. Yes, everything that has been revealed about them looks suspicious, but no more than that. It's clear that it's practically impossible to prove map hacking, but the facts we're seeing are clearly not enough to justify a ban.
P.S. It's amusing to see the opinions of all sorts of know-it-alls who haven't even looked at the saves properly, but are still pouring out criticism. Where is the presumption of innocence?
Ник в лоби - Kilgory