AmberSoler
Auto-translated
So what? The conversation was about how to determine the results of several players, and you were talking about how the positions taken create an imbalance, so you decided to count by the number of days spent on completing the game, and that's enough.
At that specific moment, the results of six players were being considered against each other. All other results – for example, yours – were irrelevant and interfered. We were playing against each other. A duel: clan against clan. And only six numbers mattered – the results of the players mentioned in that post. And to prevent any extraneous results from creating interference (imbalance), it was decided to remove them from the analysis.
You, on the other hand, are referring to the ranking, which takes into account the results of ALL players who participated in the tournament... In this case, the imbalance would be not taking into account the results of the others...
Therefore, there is a clear case of a change of concepts, caused by your misunderstanding of the situation that developed at that moment and was being discussed between the participants in the clan confrontation. Moreover, this was a private decision within the framework of one private tournament. And this does not mean that this approach should be applied to everyone...
I also noticed something else. Quite a long time has passed since the end of our debate. I deliberately refrain from commenting on the ranking calculation except when you ask me questions, posting excerpts from my posts on another occasion. Nevertheless, you continue to look for justification for your method, apparently realizing its inadequacy. If you were completely confident in its validity, I think you would have stopped looking for justifications a long time ago... :D But the fact remains!
That's why I see that you hear the bell, but you don't know where it is. You yourself honestly admitted it :) And your logic is not getting any better :)
P.s. Dear IronAxe, I ask you in the future not to comment on my words, taking them out of context of any conversations in the past, due to the inability (confirmation - above) to understand their meaning. (This is not a personal attack! - I anticipate the statement - I am simply stating a fact). I do not have the time or desire to explain again what exactly I wanted to convey with my words in a particular situation. Those who participated in that conversation understood everything. You did not participate - what is the point of you getting involved? It was a private conversation between the participants in the clan duel, and my words did not apply to you... Right? ;)
If you write a reply, read it several times. Otherwise, there will be statements like "you are avoiding the conversation," "you do not want to prove your point," "you do not see the mistakes that I have shown you"... And so on. You are already too predictable.
P.p.s. If you do not answer this post of mine, I will be grateful to you... I'm tired of the spam.
