Kyle
Auto-translated
I suggest you consider making an announcement stating the minimum number of participants required for a tournament to be considered valid for clan rating calculations.
And I decided to base it on the popularity of each version (see the poll on our portal as an example).
The first one is the founder of the series and, as a result, has been largely forgotten or even unknown to many.
The second one is a logical development of the first, with its own atmosphere that many admire, but for some reason, very few actually play. It's a pity...
The third one is a logical development of the second. The recognized leader of the series.
The fourth one is a revolution in the series, but unfortunately, it wasn't accepted by everyone, which is a shame. In my opinion, the fifth one should have been based on the fourth.
The fifth one is a logical development of the third. A new and popular game with all the consequences that follow.
Therefore, I suggest:
For the first game - two people;
For the second game - two people;
For the third game - three or four people;
For the fourth game - two people;
For the fifth game - three or four people;
I look forward to your comments.
Sincerely.