"Newcomer-2013. Winter"

Let's not argue. Neither Gasik nor I knew about the rules for the novice final. We played, and he agreed to a 2-0 score. As in other tournaments, the winner received an advantage... It was also a surprise for him, as it was for me (though I won't hide that it was unpleasant), that there was no advantage. The question now is different. We agreed to play to three wins (with an initial 1-0 lead for me). And, as we thought, I needed two wins to win the novice tournament. Now it turns out I don't have an advantage, and I need to win three times (last year, it took "tvaryne" only two wins)... So, at least make it best of two. As it was last year. The organizers are to blame for this misunderstanding. All the conditions of the tournament should be clarified immediately so that there are no misunderstandings later, and the players know what to expect. P.S. Also, in the 1/8 round, when I played against Artem (Nestor86), he had time constraints. We agreed on one game, and there was a clause that if we met in the super final, neither of us would have an advantage... So, initially, probably, no one knew that this tournament was being held differently than others.