Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
AllRating_new = AllRating_old + (P1 + P2 +P3)/3, where P1-P3 is the tournament rating of the three best players in the clan in this tournament (not to be confused with the current rating).
I don't mind. It's simple and convenient. That's how it should be.
AmberSoler;65753
Of course, we can discuss the question - why three, and not two or five? I'll say this: given the average number of players in clans, in my opinion, this is the optimal number of results to be counted.
No need to discuss why three. Three is enough :) It's the optimal number.
Added 4 minutes ago AlexeyPank;65804
You've dismissed my formula again because of its apparent complexity :(. Well, okay.
Perhaps your formula is correct and gives the correct bonus. But the value of this bonus seems to be so small that is it worth doing such calculations?
Added 11 minutes ago AlexeyPank;65804
If we are talking about calculating the clan rating, I think that the results of everyone who played should be taken into account. Otherwise, there will really be no place for the weak. But if we take everyone into account, we need to abandon both the simple sum (not for the Chinese) and the average value (to give young and inexperienced players an advantage). Therefore, we need to find a compromise, but not one that gives an advantage to one or another system, but one that takes both into account, but is itself a third parameter.
Or maybe we should just calculate two ratings for each clan. One according to AmberSoler's formula - this is the average strength of the clan based on three players. And the total strength of the clan - where we simply use the sum of the results of all players in the clan in the tournament. It will probably be difficult to create a general rating that reflects the real state of affairs. Well, unless you can take everything into account, then that would be good.
Here, it turns out that AmberSoler's formula will not take into account the results of many players, and this reduces their interest. And if we calculate based on everyone, then we get the situations described by AmberSoler.