Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Out of the 12 who voted, only 5 explained their position. The rest voted without comment. Therefore, the question is – why were the usernames of the voters removed from the voting table? By the way, only one player (AlexeyPank) voted FOR the third option, and yet it is in the lead... I ask that you identify those who are lobbying for it. :) This is not a secret ballot.
2 Kyle. I would like to hear your position on this issue.
You are the author and the driving force behind this topic. The ball is in your court.
Added 9 minutes later
AlexeyPank;65544
Anyone who wants to can simply look at the results and see that a certain clan is in first place only because of the number of players, while another clan is truly strong because its members took the first two places. This can easily be displayed in the clan ranking.
Are you talking about the ranking? It seems to me that you are only talking about statistics – how many people participated, how many didn't, who took what place, etc...
Your words:
and some [clan] is truly strong
So this very clan should be leading in the strength ranking. Isn't that right? Your option does not provide for this.