Preliminary clan ranking on HW.

To be honest, I didn't really want to suggest any particular system...
I just wanted to challenge the idea that the ranking should consider the declared players... Then you could simply remove all the declarations... But why???
Added 3 minutes ago
By the way, I wanted to vote for #2 and #3... I checked the box for #2, then for #3, and voted... I didn't even notice that the first one was unchecked... I don't care which of them it is, as long as it's not the first one =)

I basically agree with that. But option #2 is a little more optimal. If option #3 passes, then you need to calculate the arithmetic mean from the calculated ratings of the clan's players. What will happen to the weak players? Saving drowning people is the responsibility of the drowning people themselves - they should have voted - AmberSoler explained this clearly. But it seems they are hoping that the arithmetic mean will not be used, and then the "Chinese" will show who is who :)
As for the arithmetic mean option, nothing prevents the Outcasts from creating their own clan and calling it "The Outcasts" :)

Added 15 minutes ago

I've slightly modified that formula, adding one more element to it. Now it looks like this: B = (R(i) - M(i))/N * (SQUARE ROOT of K), where K is the average tournament coefficient. This reduces the possibility of errors by an order of magnitude. And there is simply no aging in my system, so you can only lower the rating by skipping a tournament if other players surpass you in their total rating. Plus, it is necessary that in the tournament in which this player participates, his rating (specifically in this tournament, among all those who submitted saves) is the lowest. You have to agree, that's too many conditions.

Oh, come on, you fixed it :), is that even a formula, it's so small, where are the logarithms? tangents? catenaries? You need to refine it further. I'm curious, besides AmberSoler, how many people understood the amazing effect of this formula :) And what to expect from it during calculations. I'll repeat once more. Using my system, I can easily calculate a rating for our player even if he played on a different map, with a different resource, with a different set of players who don't even have a rating.
I suggest a compromise for the last time :)
1. Speed, experience, resources, and unit tournaments should only be calculated using a non-linear system. (The main parameter here is the quantity). No coefficients should be used.
2. The arena should only be calculated using a linear system. (The main parameter here is the PLACE). Coefficients are at AmberSoler's discretion.
3. These ratings should be considered equivalent and allowed to be added together for players.

Otherwise, you understand, Carthage must be destroyed :)