Calculating the rating for clans!

How do you want to compare results on DIFFERENT maps? The fact that I completed one in 1000 days and another in 10 doesn't mean I've become 100 times better. The map is simply DIFFERENT. Therefore, the rating for each map is unique. A non-linear system would be ideal if all Tournaments were played on the SAME map. Then it would be clear that a player who is 10 days behind the leader and another who is 1000 days behind have different scores. But this is only if the map was identical, or rather, the starting saves were identical. If not, how do you compare them? This is where the oscillator and my bonus come in handy. We are comparing results on DIFFERENT maps, not on ONE.

AlexPank - you're getting on my nerves :) If you don't understand how the comparison works in a non-linear system on different maps, that doesn't mean no one else understands it. My system was reviewed by two people at the very beginning - Prophet and VDV. And they accepted it without any oscillators or bonuses. How do you explain to me that they didn't notice the "bug" you're talking about in my system? Or do you think VDV intended to always hold all his Tournaments on the same map? :) The leader and the acceptable limits of his completion are the starting points in my system. If YOU are 10 days behind the leader on one map, and 1000 days behind the leader in another Tournament on a different map, then you played 100 times worse than in the first Tournament and will receive a rating that corresponds to your performance. What's not clear about that?

How do you want to compare results on DIFFERENT maps? The fact that I completed one in 1000 days and another in 10 doesn't mean I've become 100 times better. The map is simply DIFFERENT.

:) Look at the nonsense you're writing! Let me ask you a question in the same style: How do you want to compare results on DIFFERENT maps ACCORDING TO YOUR OSCILLATOR AND BONUS? The fact that I finished in 1000th place on one map and 10th place on another map doesn't mean I've become 100 times better. The map is simply DIFFERENT. You understand that it doesn't matter how many days you took to complete it and what place you took. Place is a less significant parameter than DAYS. And I'm showing you that the leader completed it in 10 days and took 1st place, and you completed it in 1000 days and took 2nd place. It's probably clear to everyone now that PLACE doesn't mean anything! The number of days to complete has a basic and key weight. And you're using a bonus and oscillator to shift the focus to the PLACE parameter. I've already told you and I'll repeat it again - I'd rather be dead than use this PLACE