Even if that were the case. If there isn't a continent or even a small island, there's a mine, you said so yourself. That mine is, by definition, Australia. If there's no mine, there's something else. A shaft, a quarry, a gopher, or a muskrat. It doesn't matter. If there's nothing, then there's the product of our imagination, which we call Australia. It doesn't matter what Australia is, it exists by definition.
What definition are you talking about? Give me a link to the proof with that definition. Everyone who supposedly goes to Australia ends up in a different place. That place they end up in exists, but it's a different place. But the Australia that everyone supposedly goes to doesn't exist. There is no such place.
Well, I still don't believe it. All of this doesn't prove the existence of Australia in any way.
Added 5 minutes later
You probably don't realize it, but you're parodying yourself right now.
Think about it again. Who am I switching places with, and who am I parodying? ;)
But this isn't even a parody, it's a copy of how those who start arguing without even studying the issue usually respond – the subject of the conversation.
"Неизвестная история человечества. Запрещенная археология (с иллюстрациями), Майкл Кремо, Ричард Томпсон,479с,1.46 Мб.
Вакцинация младенцев в роддомах преступление!
Вред прививок или правда о вакцинации