Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Regarding artificially lowering your rating – how do you envision that working? Intentionally lose a couple of tournaments, get a negative bonus, and then win a tournament where no one wants to participate, thus regaining your rightful zero rating? There are too many factors to consider, including the desire of specific players to participate in a particular tournament.
Alex, let's go back a bit to our conversation about bonuses. Remember my example, where a player with a zero rating could gain 2,500 points in a single tournament, while the rest would be stuck around a hundred...
Iron specifically recalled this scenario, and if we don't see it as a problem, then a particularly "gifted" player, without breaking the rules, could lower their rating by skipping a couple of tournaments due to the aging system... And then, their brilliant performance would raise them to an unreachable height... The difficulty lies in the fact that a conscientious player, who is actually a strong player but, for objective reasons, cannot play frequently, could end up in a similar awkward situation. And from the outside, it would look exactly the same... So, that's why we're having this conversation – it's better not to create such scenarios in the first place.