Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
what's interesting is that the analysis of the episode with "pp" ended perfectly
they changed the rules for the better
so if anyone is unhappy with the rule about two DD - suggest how to change the wording of the rule for the better, so that it can be applied to the situation under discussion without falling into despair
Not by the rules at all! I myself twice found myself in situations where I did 2 DD in important Tournaments games "in the heat of battle," so to speak (once on Jebe and once on 8MM6, where only one DD was allowed). Such restrictions must be made functionally, at the level of code or text files. A player very often violates rules without suspecting it, and without any intent. And these violations are not the players' fault — but rather everything that was rendered on the map with bugs. If I see a passage and can go there — then I go there, regardless of whether there should be guards there or not... spare me from these reflections by rendering the map correctly. Make it so that I cannot violate the rules, but only play. Because players' responsibility should be adequate — and not at the cost of the match (for example, introduce a point system for results, 0.7 to 0.3 instead of 1-0 or introduce "-0.1" for no-show).