Mafia 64. Albens Corvus

As for Yashur, it's unclear. I don't know exactly how he gave himself away; I didn't understand for a long time why he was being targeted.

Well... basically, that's what happened.

1. I decided to check out "old" Shemrok right away on the first night (yes, Yashur's intuition is still working perfectly :D).
2. For some reason, you decided to try and expose Wolfstet-Curias.;)
3. On the second day, when I already knew about Shemrok's team affiliation, and Mentu (whom I knew) was already being "framed" (although he hadn't been "hanged" yet), I decided to use Arandor's post about "mafia newbies" and wrote that Shemrok was a member of the mafia (you can argue about the "100%" part, but I did remove that word a little later). I was interested in seeing the public's reaction. :smile26: I didn't provide any arguments (according to the rules, I'm not obliged to justify my accusations), but I was ready to say (if anyone asked why I was "attacking" Shemrok) that I just chose the first newbie on the list.
4. However, no one asked anything; instead, the discussion turned to Yashur's "giveaway" and so on. And then the GM started "attacking" me. :smile10: :(
5. Vespyr, you, and Rudy gave yourselves away with your reaction. And Mona joined in for some reason. :confused:
6. I decided to investigate (in order of decreasing suspicion): Vespyr, then you, and finally, Rudy. Result: Vespyr is an "old" player.
7. I wrote in the thread (again, without providing arguments, because I'm not obliged to) that Shemrok and Vespyr are members of the mafia. Again, I was ready to answer the question, "Why do you think that?" But instead of a question, I received a "notification" from the GM...:mad: :mad: :mad:

He's acting a little inappropriately right now.

I would really like to know what my "inappropriateness" consists of. :confused: