Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Hmm, hmm, hmm... something doesn't seem quite right... What's the purpose of this list? :confused: And why assign a 0 to a player who is listed in the clan's representative thread but hasn't actually played? And what if they are listed for all versions? Should we assign five zeros and lower the clan's rating in all versions? This will lead to everyone only having one, their favorite version, listed, or just the message "haven't decided yet!" Or, if I play a version that I'm not listed for, will my rating not be taken into account? I perfectly understand that you are trying to combat "ghost players" with this method! I support the fight, but not with this approach... Think about it... The rating should reflect the clan's strength, right? And strength is determined by the players who actually play, not just those who are listed! So, I'm only listed for version 3, and so far, I've only played it... But, if I now add myself to the other versions in the representative thread, will the clan's rating suddenly drop? But will the clan's strength actually change? Shouldn't these two parameters correspond to each other?
Conclusion: the clan's rating should be calculated based on actual gameplay! And a zero should be assigned only if a player has registered directly for the tournament but hasn't submitted the final save file. IMO, this would be fairer.