Calculating the rating for clans!

Iron! Can you please stop acting like a child? Everyone is tired of it.

You are not my father or mother to tell me what to do, especially in that tone. So take a deep breath :).

I am writing here, and not in private messages, solely for one reason – to stop spreading confusion regarding the rating calculation. Everyone says the same thing: the non-linear component is the basic foundation of the rating. However, due to its high degree of inaccuracy and rigidity, attempts are being made to smooth out the sharp edges using mathematics and logic. If someone doesn't quite understand how math and logic work, they can create a special topic in the Offtopic section and practice their eloquence... Stop arguing and trying to pit everyone against each other. In every topic, it’s the same thing… I hope you at least know where Carthage is located? :)

Who is "everyone"? Three people don't represent everyone.
With your logic and mathematics, you are not improving but DISTORTING the non-linear part, so don't confuse others with this. It seems like you have the same things in all your posts. For example, Kyle constantly writes about no aging, and you constantly resort to personal attacks, Lobachevsky! Indeed,
it was one of the forum members who wrote this to YOU, not ME:
"Soler, I think someone didn't want to go over this again..."
So you yourself suffer from what you try to attribute to me. And if I believe that the linear part distorts the results, then for any of your promotional posts in its favor, I will continue to give a comment that I deem necessary.

Added 2 minutes ago

When calculating the clan rating, the number of participants in the clan does not matter. Otherwise, there is no point in calculating the rating. Just count the number of players.
When calculating the tournament rating, the number of opponents does matter because this reflects the player's strength when considering their position.
What is unclear?

Don't mislead people. The player's strength is shown not by the number of people they have beaten, but by their result relative to the leader in days.
Is it still unclear?

Added 58 minutes ago

Take it easy!
Don't make incorrect conclusions from correct facts! Yes, I believe that the oscillator is more accurate than your system. And I calculated the rating (by the way, it’s preliminary) using your system only because the "Best of the Best" tournament was already calculated using your system. I didn't change the system for calculating the tournament rating to avoid questions like: "Why is my rating 'x' in the "TOURNAMENTS RESULTS!" topic and 'y' in your table?"

AmberSoler said here that I established a rating calculation system by publishing the results for BestOfBest based on three parameters. I think you are acting rashly by using the same methodology. You should have calculated it as you see fit, instead of adapting to it. Questions about why there is a different rating ("why is my rating y there and Y here or vice versa?") with many different rating calculation systems are inappropriate. Therefore, while it's not too late, recalculate the clan rating using the oscillator and don't forget about the AlexPanka coefficient. Let's see what happens, and then tell us how much effort the recalculation required. And one more time, let's see how you smooth out the rating with the linear part and bonus for outsiders. I think you will greatly please them with your improvements :)