In general, the rating will be based on the option that is closest to the opinion of the person doing the calculations. And no one will force him to calculate it differently... There's no need to look far for examples... :) After Iron didn't find support for his calculation method in the thread, he simply published the rating, thereby securing his right to this particular method... His calculation method wouldn't have survived a vote... :)
Added 1 minute ago
I completely agree, and I think that those who are interested can express their opinions anyway.
:smile52: :smile12: :smile40: Spot on!
And this guy is laughing, but he calculated the tournament rating for clan players based solely on the non-linear component, i.e., according to my system. Although he seems to think he's against it :D. It's clear, it's a case of scratching each other's backs - clan members :) However, he supported AmberSoler, but calculated the rating in a way that is better and more convenient :)
Added 9 minutes ago
I absolutely agree with the respected Adelaide!
Today, there are already 6 ratings! I think you can choose any that suits you.
And in most of them, the non-linear part, the dependence of the rating on the number of days the leader has been playing, is supposedly taken as the basis. That is, everyone is trying to improve something, give bonuses, smooth out the results, take into account as many parameters as possible. They are already using formulas that are not just three-story, but four-story :) And this usually leads to the result - they wanted to make it better, but it turned out as always :) And therefore, Carthage must be destroyed :D