Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Then the following question arises, albeit a somewhat silly one: **is the attacking player obligated to attack? Does he have the option to demand a draw or a rematch from the defending player, with the defeated army being disbanded and a subsequent ransom paid?** The absurdity lies in the fact that shackles prevent anyone from escaping – meaning they must fight to the bitter end, and there must be one winner... but a situation arises where both players know that everything depends on the first attack and they simply stand there and wait. The defender says: Attack, you initiated the attack. And the attacker says: I don't want to, I'll lose... The defender asks: So, what are we going to do? The attacker replies: I don't know. That's why I started this discussion to clarify the situation...
- Почему женщины любят кентавров? - И мужик в доме, и скотина в хозяйстве.
Штирлиц шел по коридору. Вдруг одна из дверей открылась, оттуда выскочил Борман, дал Штирлицу сильного пендаля и заскочил обратно. «Гарпия» - догадался Штирлиц.