Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
...there are already 6 rankings!... Dear Kyle, please open a vote for the existing rankings.
I hope you're joking... Considering that you won't get more than 20 votes, and half of them will be for statistical purposes, i.e., without relevant comments, I think it will only create extra traffic... :) In my opinion, you should narrow down the number of options to 2-3 at most and then put them up for a vote if you trust this method of decision-making...
In general, the ranking will be based on the option that is closest to the opinion of the person doing the calculations :) And no one will force him to calculate it differently... There's no need to look far for examples... :) After Iron didn't find support for his calculation method in the thread, he simply published the ranking, thereby securing his right to this particular method... His calculation method wouldn't have survived a vote... :) So, it's all just a game... However the ranking is calculated, let it be calculated that way - as long as there are equal conditions for everyone. And, preferably, also tournaments... :)