Mafia 63. Knights of the Square Table

Hmm... Hermit seems to have been the White Rook. He attacked several times. However, his attack ended unsuccessfully: - defense; - attack on Gray. Arandor was being defended. It's clear that this was a defense of the Black pieces. I no longer doubt that Arandor is the Black King. I fell for GoedenDag's trick, thinking he was the White Rook attacking Morning. In the end, I messed up. Shame on me. And I also criticized Zubra in Star Wars. I messed everything up myself. Now, it seems to me that the situation completely depends on Gray. **White:** - King - +3 votes; - Rook #1 (Amko) †; - Rook #2 (Hermit) †; - Knight B1 (Morning) †; - Knight G1 (Gur) †; - Bishop C1 - kill; - Pawn E2 (Yashur) †; - Pawn F2 - empty; - Pawn A2 (GoedenDag) †. **Black:** - King - +2 votes; - Queen (Phoenix) †; - Rook H8 - kill; - Knight B8 (Nephela) †; - Knight G8 (Lorelei) †; - Bishop C8 (Vishmaster) †; - Bishop F8 - kill; - Pawn E7 - defense (alive, not defending the target), counter-kill; - Pawn B7 - empty. Black has one more piece. If we hang AlexIgl as Gray today, then everything depends on chance and the defense of the Pawn. If we hang Arandor as a Black piece, everything will depend on Gray. **Execute Arandor.** Added 4 minutes later I also want to note that, in principle, the failure was also caused by the passivity of most players. Almost no one is writing anything. Hermit wrote that it was not necessary to vote against Morning. This, by the way, seems to have been the reason for the attack on him. It turned out that he attacked, hit a 50% defense or something like that, and in response, the same piece hit Hermit and broke through the percentages. Damn, Hermit should have been more active in writing about Morning. In any case, he should have provided some arguments, and not just "let's vote for Arandor." Okay. After the fight, it's no use waving your fists.