Qwerty
Auto-translated
Guys, no offense.
1. The idea of a "decaying" rating is good. But we need to face reality. How much worse can a player perform after a quarter of inactivity? Maybe 10 percent, probably no more. After a year, it's probably around 40 percent. Results older than 15 months are not taken into account in the rating.
So, the decay coefficient is 10% per quarter. And it should be based on the time factor, not the tournament factor.
2. You can't see the forest for the trees. There are 13 pages in the topic, but it's not clear how the rating is calculated.
1. The idea of a "decaying" rating is good. But we need to face reality. How much worse can a player perform after a quarter of inactivity? Maybe 10 percent, probably no more. After a year, it's probably around 40 percent. Results older than 15 months are not taken into account in the rating.
So, the decay coefficient is 10% per quarter. And it should be based on the time factor, not the tournament factor.
2. You can't see the forest for the trees. There are 13 pages in the topic, but it's not clear how the rating is calculated.
Орден Феникса – харизматический :) лидер