So, I'm essentially waiting for answers to the following questions:

Therefore, I ask that you answer the poll as objectively as possible, outside the context of the current situation. 1. Who understood the phrase about "opening saves" (quoted in the first post) as a ban on loading and analyzing saves in single-player? 2. Who has loaded saves in this way and is not afraid to admit it openly?

This will determine what I write in my summary. Perhaps I don't understand the new Russian jargon. If so, then that's how it should be. Roman, and those who think the same way, are mistaken, and this is obvious to me. You really think that if it turns out that everything is fine with the saves, it will bother anyone?

1. There was a fact of opening saves. 2. At a minimum, there was movement of 4 heroes. This is enough to disqualify you and send you away without discussion. Why should we delve into the saves and determine the depth of the maphack and its impact on the game? We are not interested in looking for what else happened and thinking about what might have happened.

This thought is important. The impact of a possible maphack on the game is irrelevant. For me, the very essence of this body was to dissuade the community from thinking that some additional facts and dates should determine anything. Those who live like a player under the nickname Vlk777 with a cat and a turtle do not understand the circumstances of a person's life in other conditions. Maybe if someone finds a save with an open map on their laptop, for the current AK, this is a reason to accuse someone of using a maphack. For me, on the contrary, this is only a suspicion, because friends could have been visiting. A girl could have opened the save, or something else. Maybe a child wanted to play around. Then there will be an analysis. I have always maintained that the game should prove guilt, not attributes. And, frankly, there is a certain sporting interest in beating a cheater. But this is only the first meaning. Now, let's read the phrase again carefully:

1. There was a fact of opening saves. 2. At a minimum, there was movement of 4 heroes. This is enough to disqualify you and send you away without discussion. Why should we delve into the saves and determine the depth of the maphack and its impact on the game? We are not interested in looking for what else happened and thinking about what might have happened.

In essence, this means only one thing. AK did not find anything significantly suspicious in the saves of my games, of which there are a sufficient number. Because it is "not interesting," of course, this is just a stylistic device. In reality, they were looking and didn't find anything. So, what kind of defamation is this? In the eyes of the jackals? They already considered everyone who plays better than them to be cheaters. In general, wait for the summary...