Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Let's start with linguistics. I don't remember the name(s) of the author(s) of the current rules revision. But it's quite obvious that they didn't have a sufficient command of the Russian language. So, the expression "opening saves, opening the map" is not quite Russian. Just say it out loud, feel it. You can open a brain if necessary, or a safe, but in Russian, you can't "open a map" - it sounds awkward even within the context of Newspeak. Therefore, I ask you to express your opinion on this topic below.

In Russian, there is also no word "save," and by "map," we mean not a playing card or a geographical map, but a file with the extension h3m. And you can open something that is hidden. Information about the opponent's actions and the location of objects on the map are also hidden, and they need to be revealed in the game. Why are you trying to make everyone look like fools when you yourself understand what "opening" means in HMM3? You were rightly told about D'Artagnan.

Secondly, let's get back to my point. I really can't figure out WHAT they are accusing me of.

It's a pity that you don't see WHAT they are accusing you of. In fact, what is known: 1. There was a fact of opening saves. 2. At least, there was movement of 4 heroes. This is enough to remove you and send you far, far away without discussion. Why should we delve into the saves and find out the depth of the maphack and its influence on the course of the game? We are not interested in finding out what else happened and thinking about what could have happened.

Sema remembered, I have already apologized a hundred times for that incident, and I have never denied my guilt in it. Moreover, the situation with Tvarina is similar. I DON'T UNDERSTAND...

You are probably a bit crazy, since you don't see the connection? In both cases, it was a single-player game without an opponent, and that's what you are being accused of.