Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

This is an example of how investigations should be more transparent (and by the way, if you assign a black list label to any player, which serves as an indicator for everyone, then you must make absolutely all decisions with an open discussion of the circumstances!)
Even criminal cases are available online for users.

I read that Oelm "supposedly left," but isn't that proof of guilt?< And he doesn't have to react immediately. I'm not defending him; I'm looking at it from a legal perspective.

To clarify, I trust and believe you more than him, but this only confirms my statement that I currently see (in the absence of detailed analysis) bias.

Well, I tried to explain the main points in simple terms, here.

The blacklist is not a death sentence; you can always appeal the decision, and if there are valid reasons, we will remove the player from it – we will remove them. So far, I haven’t seen even close to those grounds.

And in general, certain changes in the approach to determining fair and unfair play should occur soon. Fortunately, corrupted saves have been used stably for a long time, plus, as I think, we need to somehow regulate transactions and all abuses that may arise from them.

Once again, neither I nor anyone else on the AC enjoys such disputes; we advocate for an objective consideration of any issues, but if a player takes a defiant stance, disappears at the most inappropriate moment, and refuses to engage in dialogue when they need to, then this only worsens their situation, as Vic said.