Skip to content

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

User Avatar
#717
Auto-translated
numOne
Pff... you clearly don't know what's going on. During the stream, they were discussing this with the player in question (there are logs from their ICQ conversation), and the player directly asked him to send those save files (the ones seen when loading Oelm's saves). If Oelm had immediately slapped himself on the forehead, saying, "Oh, how awkward," and instantly sent them, and if nothing suspicious had been found, the issue would have resolved itself with a 90% probability. But (!) he went offline (his health suddenly deteriorated), which cast a specific shadow on him. And he only reappeared after a significant amount of time. Any honest player would never allow themselves to do that, or they would be ashamed and burn with shame, and their excuses would sound completely different.
This is an example of how investigations should be more transparent (and, by the way, if you label any player with a blacklist, which is visible to everyone, then you must make absolutely all decisions with an open discussion of the circumstances!)
Even criminal cases are available online for users.

I read that Oelm "supposedly left," but that's not proof of guilt, right? And he's not obligated to react immediately. I'm not defending him; I'm looking at it from a legal perspective.

To be clear, I trust you more than him, but this only confirms my point that I
currently see (in the absence of a review of the events) a lack of objectivity.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...