Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

By the way, regarding dates, I had an episode with Oelm where, when loading a saved game, I saw a strange date on it. I started investigating, and it turned out that Oelm, with trance enabled, had created a new save, and the date on that one was also strange. After that, we continued the game. Nevertheless, I'll say this: acting crazy and making wild accusations when talking to authorized individuals is not the right approach. Rebel suffered a lot because, instead of clearly stating his position, he started to rant and engage in unproductive behavior. If he had provided the necessary explanations and confirmed that Stiky was responsible, this whole situation could have been avoided. If there are doubts about the competence or impartiality of an authorized individual, the issue should be immediately brought up for general discussion, without giving the opponent time to prepare for an attack or gather arguments. This is one of those cases where delaying action does not benefit the defending side. Again, returning to Rebel, if he had initiated the discussion himself and thought through a defense strategy, the decision might have been different. In borderline situations, this can help sway the balance in your favor. And in general, it's easier to defend yourself before a decision is made than to try to get it overturned afterward.