Skip to content

"King of the Hill"

User Avatar
#144
Auto-translated
R55Max
What does "can" mean? Are you playing hide-and-seek? Or maybe you won't get a chance at all, or you'll get one after 9 months and won't play 5 times in a row.
You'll like it when you get a chance, become the chip leader in terms of wins, and watch with wide eyes as another player gets a chance to win the tournament just because they had 5 times more access to King of the Hill games than you? Everyone should have the same number of chances, and how they use them should determine the winner.

You could offer all participants n number of chances (the number is the same, for example, 5). Then, if a player receives 5 chances, they go into a waiting group. The tournament continues randomly until everyone has used their chances. The player who has used their chances and surpassed the others in the number of wins becomes the King of the Hill.

This is just one of the ways to avoid the random selection of a winner. :)
You're quite the idealist, especially with "Everyone should have the same number of chances"... I don't want to get into a tautology, but for example, this year there are 365 participants. Even if King of the Hill games (again, for example) were held once a day, and there were 368 participants, or even 740, there still wouldn't be fairness. This tournament is essentially unbalanced; whether it's less or more doesn't matter much to those who have already decided to participate

лето 2012.