Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I agree with CrasH, we can consider the rating as the sum of the ratings of the best players in the clan. I think 5 people is the best number that can give an objective assessment of the clan.
I agree with the statement that we can sum up the rating of a limited number of players in the clan. But I disagree with the number "5" because it was clearly taken out of thin air... If we are going to limit the number, I suggest the number "4" because that is the minimum number of people needed in a clan to officially register it on HW. Perhaps we should conduct a poll on this matter... Adelaide;64288
...another question is whether to create a clan rating for all versions? If so, what should be summed up? The ratings of players taken from the overall rating in all versions? Or one rating for a specific version (probably the best one for the player)?
I believe that it is not necessary to create a general rating for all versions! because these are different games... the essence of the game is the same! But the games are different! Therefore, the rating should be separate for each version.
Kyle
