Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I apologize for my slow participation in this important topic! I have a lot of work in real life... I hope the rush will end soon. :( Very briefly: Regarding the Heroes 1 tournament – it will be held on time. Regarding the in-game ranking system: Of course, the discussion should continue, because we perfectly understand that the more we discuss all the nuances of one system or another, the higher the probability of creating the most optimal system! The only thing I want to note is that instead of arguing and rehashing the same questions in different interpretations, it is better to think and offer more fresh ideas to improve both systems proposed by the respected AmberSoler and IronAxe, or perhaps, by combining some parts of the aforementioned systems, come to a compromise solution: it would be reasonable to make changes and group them (taking into account all the disadvantages and shortcomings of each system) into a single system! AlexeyPank: until a final concept for calculating the in-game ranking is adopted in this topic, I suggest that you calculate the Keningham Memorial tournament using 2 systems. IronAxe: Or maybe we should only reduce the rating by 10% for players who missed the tournament? This way, one-time players will quickly drop down the tournament table! Regarding the Grail awarding system: AmberSoler, I would be grateful if you could indicate the clear advantages of your system in the GRAILS section! Perhaps your system will be the main one for calculating the GRAIL RANKING! AlexeyPank, IronAxe, Kyle, Sage and all other interested forum members, I very much ask you to carefully review the Grails topic! And express your opinion on it. I would not refuse your participation in the development of this issue! With great respect, VDV_forever