Added 1 minute ago
I don’t understand the logic; first, you find probable evidence of involvement in the mafia, and then you claim that you don’t suspect Tox of being in the mafia.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
I don’t understand the logic; first, you find probable evidence of involvement in the mafia, and then you claim that you don’t suspect Tox of being in the mafia.