Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
From now on, it is forbidden to describe completed actions in posts, for example, if you want to split a giant in half, you should not write "I jump, push off from a large rock, swing my axe over him, and split the enemy in half." Instead, you should write: "I jump, push off from a large rock, swing my axe over him, and..." and what the result of your attempt to chop the enemy is will be written by the GM or his assistant. I approve with a correction - spells that do NOT deal damage can be described as completed. No, that's a given:)
I think this applies to battles in general. I think it's not worth describing specific attacks at all. So, in general, it's interesting but not essential, as it is assumed that the battles will be described by the GMs, and the participants only describe their abilities and how they want to conduct the battle. On Saturday and Sunday, I will post detailed changes to the rules for discussion.