Preparing for the "Van Kanegem" tournament.

I see the topic is developing... :) I'm already starting to get lost in the new features...
Who determines the "reasonable acceptable limit" and what is the degree of trust in this specialist? That's the first thing.

I determine it. The degree of trust will be shown by practice - my rating is experimental. And without these acceptable limits, there remains a flaw if the leader is a player with 1000 days (I'm exaggerating, you understand the meaning).

And secondly, there is no point in counting from the "acceptable limit". Because a proportionality coefficient is simply applied - and a reducing coefficient is applied to the tournament rating of all players.
k=D(acceptable limit)/D(leader), where D is the number of days spent on completing the game. In other words, why complicate the calculation mechanism if no one gets an advantage?

It won't work. Look at that file with the lyrics - everything is clear there. Or will I misunderstand you again? What do you mean by D(acceptable limit)?
For a map of the large type, the acceptable limit is from 1 to 36 days, so that the leader gets 100. Everyone else is based on that. If he gets between 36 and 43, he will get approximately 80, and everyone else is based on that. BUT it's not linear. I already said about the advantage. If the leader goes beyond all acceptable limits, completing it in 1000 days, he will get 50 - this is the minimum that the leader can get. I take this into account in the situation when Dmitry and Radik accidentally miss the next tournament, and if, at the same time, no one can show a result worthy of it (within the limits), then it is illogical to put a hundred into the rating. We will be to blame if we can't.

It seems, on the contrary - it does not take into account the place occupied by the player... Or what was meant? :)

Why should I take into account the place - it is automatically included there. The fewer days, the higher the place :) But if there are too many days, then no place will help :) You will get the first place, taking into account the DAYS!

Added 6 minutes ago

yes, I understood everything in the VDV system, it's just that there are so many different other systems being discussed here that it's hard to figure out where what is... and the aging is comforting because I will be 8 points behind the leader.

That's right, the stronger the player and the higher his rating, the more he should maintain his status, showing that he is strong and can easily cover the costs of aging with his results and move forward. That's another thing. It was planned to age by 33%, but people don't want to. Otherwise, the leaders would have to work even harder, or those who want to be them :) Maybe VDV will agree to age by 33% at least once a year in a super tournament? :)

Added 9 minutes ago

yes, I understood everything in the VDV system, it's just that there are so many different other systems being discussed here that it's hard to figure out where what is... and the aging is comforting because I will be 8 points behind the leader.

Because in the Kanigema tournament, they wanted to calculate the rating in a special way. The fact that there will be no aging during the tournament is correct. But they also want to take into account the place occupied by the player. But then the meaning of the non-linear component disappears in some major situations. Yes, there may never be such situations - but what if they happen? Obvious flaws are visible in stupid examples, and if the examples are complex, the flaw will not disappear, it will just be less noticeable.