Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I see the topic is developing... :) I'm already starting to get lost in all the new features... IronAxe;64011
Acceptable limits have been introduced for leaders, depending on the size of the map.
Who determines the "reasonable acceptable limit," and how much trust do we place in this expert? That's the first thing.IronAxe;64011
In other words, if a leader doesn't meet the reasonable limits for completing the game, they won't get 100 points for the tournament. Consequently, the others will be jumping ahead of the leader.
And secondly, there's no point in calculating from the "acceptable limit." Because a proportionality coefficient is simply applied – and a reducing coefficient is applied to the tournament rating of all players. k = D(acceptable limit) / D(leader), where D is the number of days spent completing the game. In other words, why complicate the calculation mechanics if no one gets an advantage?IronAxe;64011
The system automatically takes into account the place occupied by the player – the fewer days, the higher the place.
It seems, on the contrary, that it doesn't take into account the place occupied by the player... Or what was meant? :)