Skip to content

[2x2 Tournament] Resurrection

User Avatar
#296
Auto-translated
Oelm
Nonsense, Alex has already written everything about the Fortress battle. The fact that you still don't understand how the battle was lost without the bug is not my problem; it only highlights the absurdity of your disrespectful behavior towards opponents and organizers, and even the tournament participants in general. Even if there hadn't been a win, you had no right to behave like that, in my opinion, and with this, it just turns into a farce.

I'll write a plan later, but for now, I'll see who else is even looking at it.

write, write, we'll read it)))
because Alex wrote, albeit eloquently, but in terms of the plan, berserk + frenzy is not clear
he's right about anti-magic on the Viv, unfortunately, I couldn't adequately follow the battle :(
there was berserk on the Viv from the opponents anyway, regarding frenzy -- at what specific moment?
if berserk works correctly, i.e., for 1 round, then casting berserk + frenzy takes as long as 2 rounds, during which time a lot can be done, in particular, the damage to the Archons from Imps is comparable, if not greater, than the damage to the Monarchs from them, and we shouldn't forget about the +3 morale for the Viv))
so the calculation was only on a buggy berserk, but even without it, frenzy wasn't needed :)

and the invasion of the Castle's respawn on turn 116 was also considered; Alex is absolutely right about this))

and regarding the disrespectful attitude towards opponents (who are also organizers))) -- I can't stop laughing :smile11: do you even read the posts before writing here? or is it that calling them "respected" is a repeatedly occurring typo? :D :D the opponents themselves do not deny that they used a bug, considering themselves entitled to do so! I agree with this, what else? they know the game inside and out, they know how to apply it in practice, which, without any reservations, deserves respect, and the controversial moments are just a matter of personal preference)))
and it's up to AK to somehow fix these controversial moments, because now everyone knows about them, which, of course, can introduce some additional imbalance into the gameplay
and you're telling me to sit here and not write, even though in all my posts I'm just trying to clarify the situation, which, by the way, is also unclear to the viewers -- should they not be respected?
if my teammate decided to withdraw, then the tournament is also over for me, I can't play alone anymore, so I should be indifferent! which is what it was after the game, but when all sorts of nonsense is written here, I have to respond :)
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"

(с) Roger Zelazny