Why even talk about it, you lost the game, and who knows what you've been doing since. The battle was lost, even without using the berserk ability. In this context, shouting about the Archangel is simply beyond comprehension.
but here, I apologize.
double fail)))
I watched the stream later, so I didn't quite catch the moment when the Vivs didn't attack while under berserk.
I just heard that they were under berserk – I thought they were standing alone and not attacking anyone.
but if you track that moment and draw conclusions, then:
1. cast Implosion and immediately buy 46 Monarchs (you had enough money), and then overwhelm the Arch with some combat stats and an Offense unit with armor, along with 2 Archs and a pack of Vivs.
2. cast Antimagic on the Vivs and continue attacking the Archs until they are completely eliminated, including mana, and then the Arch would have enough mana left for 1 summon ;). And there was also a stash with a Barbarian spawn, which couldn't be transferred because the portal mage, in a hurry, didn't buy it in the right place, and unfortunately, there were no bugged paths to the ally)))
so even the berserk was done with the expectation of their ignorance.
but without it, if there were any options in that battle for the red team, what were they? It would be good to justify such categorical statements, or not? :)
as for the Archangel, it wasn't my idea.
although at first, I thought that it was just a coincidence by the respected opponents.
so I wasn't particularly worried, it happens.
but if it was intentional, then it's a clear case of using game bugs, even if they aren't documented.
but in this context, it's more a matter of ethics than the tournament result :cool:
(с) Roger Zelazny